Accessibility, honestly
The short version: the house has not been formally assessed for accessibility, so this page will not tell you it is accessible. What it will do is tell you exactly what we know, what we do not, and how to get a real answer before you book.

Why this page is not a list of features
Airbnb has an accessibility-features section on every listing. For this property, it is empty — the host has not completed a formal accessibility assessment, and no features are recorded.
The tempting move here is to look at the photographs and write a plausible list: no steps at the front, wide hallways, hard flooring throughout. That would be irresponsible. Doorway widths, threshold heights, turning circles and bathroom clearances are measurements, not impressions, and the person who finds out we guessed wrong finds out at the front door after a long drive.
So: we make no accessibility claims about this property. Not step-free access, not doorway widths, not roll-in showers, not grab rails. Nothing has been measured, and nothing is being asserted.
What we can say from the listing and the photographs
These are documented facts rather than accessibility claims, and they may be useful when you are working out what to ask about:
- The house is single-story — there are no internal stairs between living areas and bedrooms.
- Flooring is hard throughout: wood-look laminate in the living areas and bedrooms, tile in the kitchen, dining room and bathrooms. No carpet.
- There are two full bathrooms.
- Parking is on the premises, on a wide concrete driveway, and there are concrete paths around the property.
- The house has air conditioning throughout.
None of the above is a substitute for a measurement, and we are not presenting it as one. You can see all of it in the forty-five photographs.
Ask us, and we will go and measure it
This is the useful offer, and it is a genuine one. Tell us the specific thing you need to know — the width of the bathroom door, whether there is a step at the back patio, the height of the bed, whether a shower has a lip — and we will measure it and give you the number before you book.
A precise answer to your actual question is worth more than a vague reassurance about everything. Message the host through the Airbnb listing — the contact page links straight to it — and say plainly that the question is an accessibility one.
If the answer turns out to be no — that the house will not work for you — we will tell you that plainly. A refused booking is a far better outcome than a guest arriving to find a house they cannot use.
Assistance animals
Assistance animals are always welcome. That is the host’s own note on the listing and it is also the law — it is not subject to the pet policy that applies to other animals. The back garden is fully fenced. More on pets here.
Getting around Roswell
Worth knowing when you plan: Roswell has no meaningful public transport network for visitors, and everything is a drive. Getting around covers it. Third-party venues set their own accessibility provision and we do not speak for any of them — check with the museum, the state park and anywhere else directly. New Mexico State Parks does list an interpretive accessible trail at Bottomless Lakes.
This website
The site itself is built to be usable with a keyboard and a screen reader: semantic headings on every page, visible focus outlines on everything interactive, descriptive alt text on all forty-five photographs, text that reflows without horizontal scrolling, and color combinations checked against WCAG AA contrast ratios rather than eyeballed.
There is no forced motion, no auto-playing media and no scroll hijacking anywhere on the site. If you hit something here that does not work with your assistive technology, tell us — that is a bug and we will fix it.
Why we are doing it this way
An accessibility statement that lists aspirations is worse than useless, because somebody will rely on it. This page follows the same rule as the rest of the site: state what is documented, say plainly what is not, and never fill a gap with something plausible. The editorial policy sets that out in full.